Seeing Spin 2 Symmetry in GEM, a Unified Field Theory
Uploaded by: sweetser
Video Description:
This 15 minute APS talk explains GEM, my unified field theory for gravity and EM, as a variation on EM, our most successful field theory. A particular problem is discussed, seeing spin 2 symmetry in the vector coupling term. Feynman in his Lectures on gravity, chapter 3, shows how a coupling coupling term has spin 1 symmetry. I show how a simple twist of the two currents leads to a spin 2 symmetry, so like charges can attract, as they do for gravity.
Tags for this video: Coupling Field Physics Spin Theory UFT Unified
Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by sweetser
| feynman qed lecture | Richard Feynman - Symmetry in Physical Law - Part 1 | Feynmans_Fear |
 |  |  |
| Richard Feynman on Scientific Investigation | The Unified Field | Quantum Mechanics: Feynman Diagram |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
| Comments for this video on YouTube |
| El spin 1 en una ... ( 11 months ago by Ulises2357) |
| El spin 1 en una particula seria que tiene que dar toda una vuelta para verse =, mientras que el spin 2 quiere desir que tiene que dar media vuelta, spin 1/2 quiere desir que tiene que dar mas de una vuelta... no se si es lo que dise aca pero me parese que era la def. |
| Well put. I am ... ( 10 months ago by Jinstack) |
| Well put. I am studying physics at the moment and this was very easy to understand. |
| Lots of information ... ( 10 months ago by 5thwheelman) |
| Lots of information in your thinking. Good stuff! However, the Unified Field Theory has to show not only what the weak force is and its relationship to EM, GAV, and the strong force, but show why the relationship between EM and GAV causes a difference in force between them explaining why EM is a much greater force than GAV. It is a machine that must be described. It is very simple, and I can see you might pick this up better than most and be able to add to it, the only game in town now..... |
| It sounds like you ... ( 9 months ago by sweetser) |
| It sounds like you are referring to the Hierarchy problem. My work has yet to address that issue. Until I have an equation that relates to a specific problem, I will just nod and say, "Yup, that is a problem". |
| THEN- trying vainly ... ( 1 month ago by urlborg) |
| THEN- trying vainly to stuff it into some couple of axis in a local finite Maxwell problem, as if it were just another kind of TV show broadcast! An arc-radian is still just a morphed excuse for a signed axis guys! This is an intellectual gimbal lock! The negative axis-range that the dimensionality of gravitation repels is this displacing-only nonexistent 'emptiness non-stuff'..... |
Tell a friend: